Group+1

Task 1: > || > || ** > Comprehension > Questions posed to other students about their project > || > || > || > ||
 * 1) What do you understand about the trend itself? What we understand is this; that it allows instant acesses to the internet from cell phones, laptops, and other mobile computing devices.
 * 2) Why do you think the trend is important for the future? This is information that we will probably need in the near future so it is important to know more about it now, before we actually must have it.
 * 3) If the actual report is written for adults, how could the project teams make the information easier for you to understand? Maybe if the terms that are used in the project are put simpler that a child might understand.
 * 4) What would you expect to find out in each trend's section? The impacts from mobile broadband on the different subjects.
 * 5) How will you decide if the project team has done a good job of their trend? we can decide iff the wiki is good from this rubric below
 * CATEGORY || ** 4-5 points ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** >1 point ** ||
 * Relevant comments about communication and collaboration between student team members of project **
 * Comments are relevant and offer excellent observations of the apparent communication and collaboration of student team members || Comments offer observations about apparent communication and collaboration of student team members || Comments offer shallow or limited observations of communication and collaboration between students || Few comments or observations offered. ||
 * >3 Knowledge/
 * Questions are relevant, posed in a manner that displays good citizenship, and useful to the overall research project. || Questions are either poorly stated or not relevant, but useful to the overall project. || Questions are either poorly stated or not relevant, and may not necessarily be useful to the overall project. || Questions are not at all relevant or useful. ||
 * Good Citizenship **
 * Student positively critiques the work of others and has clearly worked hard to word his or her responses in a tactful manner. || Student positively critiques the work of others but could have worked harder to word his or her responses in a tactful manner. || Student seems unaware or uninterested in responding to others without being prompted. || Student offers inadequate or very low levels of support to positions of others. ||
 * Assignment Criteria **
 * Student has exceeded the expectations of the course assignment. || Student has fulfilled the requirements of the assignment satisfactorily. || Student has attempted to meet the most basic levels of the assignment. || Student has not met the requirements of the assignment. ||
 * Grammar and Spelling **
 * Student uses complex, grammatically correct sentences regularly; demonstrates a high level of vocabulary; has rare misspellings. || Sentences are generally grammatically correct; occasional misspellings; spellchecker may not have been used. || Ideas are understood, but show signs of disorganization; frequent grammar and spelling errors. || Poor use of the language garbles much of the message; only an occasional idea is apparent ; spellchecker and grammar check clearly not used. ||
 * Clarity of Written Expression **
 * Student expresses themselves very clearly and has formatted the online dialogue to aid understanding. || Clear expression of the language is demonstrated most of the time. || Clear expression of the language is sometimes evident. Some of the wording is vague and ambiguous. || Student does not express themselves clearly. ||

Task 2: Complemnts:Valuable information,good pictures, good hyperlinks and most questions that are stated on the wiki are answered. suggestions: resize pictures, to much Italics
 * mobile broadband:

Task 3: This is the criterea to our peer editing:


 * Quality of Content**


 * Does the content (writing) make sense? Yes, only some small parts/sentences do not make sense.
 * Can you identify any areas which need clarification? Yes, the home page on the Mobile Broadband,around the Background-the information is thrown out and under videos in Science, Environment, and Health,Arts, Entertainment and Leisure and Education.
 * Pose three questions that arise from your reading - it could be questions about ambiguity of content, questions that were not addressed, or questions that you had after reading it (you would like more information). 1)What about the information on preschool/elementary parts of the impact on education wiki.2) Where is the information and/or visual aids on the college education. 3)Who are the team members in the Impact on Science, the Environment, and Health wiki.


 * Communication**


 * Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - effective communication? Not really but there is some discussions about the wikis.
 * Do they need more? Yes, espically under the Impact on Education.
 * Are they clear in their messages to each other? Yes, very clear but it would be better if they adressed the questions that they answered in their discussions.
 * Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration? Negotiation, no; collaboration, yes.


 * Collaboration**


 * Does the work appear to be equally shared? At times it does at other times it seems like it is written by only one person.
 * Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team? Not really, all of the wikis look really good-even though they are still not finished.


 * Presentation - Layout and Design**


 * amount and relevance of graphics and media - comment: Alot of good graphics/media.
 * Recommendations? Yes, i would recomend this.